Criticizing President Bush = Hating America
everyone out of lockstep with the bush king is against america and for the terrorists EVERYONE damnit
Now William F. Buckley Jr. Hates America
Posted by Jon Ponder | Feb. 25, 2006, 10:07 am
Remember the equation set forth by the GOP message machine:
Criticizing President Bush = Hating America
The latest America-hating critic of Dear Leader is the elder statesman of conservative fantasists himself, William F. Buckley. Under the headline “It Didn’t Work,” he writes:
One can’t doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed… And the administration has, now, to cope with failure..
Mr. Bush has a very difficult internal problem here because to make the kind of concession that is strategically appropriate requires a mitigation of policies he has several times affirmed in high-flown pronouncements. His challenge is to persuade himself that he can submit to a historical reality without forswearing basic commitments in foreign policy.
He will certainly face the current development as military leaders are expected to do: They are called upon to acknowledge a tactical setback, but to insist on the survival of strategic policies.
Yes, but within their own counsels, different plans have to be made. And the kernel here is the acknowledgment of defeat.
So Buckley is one of those cut-and-runners, huh? He’d better watch out for Swiftboaters. Bushistas don’t take kindly to this kind of talk. The next thing you know, they’ll be questioning his conservative credentials.
terorist lovers
Now William F. Buckley Jr. Hates America
Posted by Jon Ponder | Feb. 25, 2006, 10:07 am
Remember the equation set forth by the GOP message machine:
Criticizing President Bush = Hating America
The latest America-hating critic of Dear Leader is the elder statesman of conservative fantasists himself, William F. Buckley. Under the headline “It Didn’t Work,” he writes:
One can’t doubt that the American objective in Iraq has failed… And the administration has, now, to cope with failure..
Mr. Bush has a very difficult internal problem here because to make the kind of concession that is strategically appropriate requires a mitigation of policies he has several times affirmed in high-flown pronouncements. His challenge is to persuade himself that he can submit to a historical reality without forswearing basic commitments in foreign policy.
He will certainly face the current development as military leaders are expected to do: They are called upon to acknowledge a tactical setback, but to insist on the survival of strategic policies.
Yes, but within their own counsels, different plans have to be made. And the kernel here is the acknowledgment of defeat.
So Buckley is one of those cut-and-runners, huh? He’d better watch out for Swiftboaters. Bushistas don’t take kindly to this kind of talk. The next thing you know, they’ll be questioning his conservative credentials.
terorist lovers
