ITWASSOOTED

Wednesday, August 19, 2015

two seven year old boys competed in a hockey game and the loser had to suck the other boys penis after each lost game.


Sweden Continues To Fund Bizarre And Inappropriate Sex Education For Young Children

_Bildbank_Sexualundervisning_Ämnesbilder_emmaundervisar_jpg_460_999_5
Sex is big business in Sweden. In Sweden, big business means government funding and political influence. Two organizations stand out in power, influence, and wealth, and are responsible for corrupting countless children and pushing a bizarre sexual agenda: RFSU and RFSL. This article will give a brief introduction the history and current activities of these two institutions.

Sexual “Enlightenment”

RFSU, The Swedish Association for Sexuality Education, was founded in 1933 by Elise Ottesen-Jensen, also known as Ottar. Ottesen-Jensen was a Norwegian syndicalist who is best known to an international audience for being one of the co-founders of International Planned Parenthood Federation.
Today, the journal of RFSU, Ottar, still bears her name. Free abortion is one of the most important issues of RFSU, but the organization is also the authority on all sexual issues, from contraceptives to education on the actual act itself.
Elise_Ottesen-Jensen
Elise Ottesen-Jensen agitating in her youth.
Sexual education in Swedish schools does include representatives from RFSU visiting the class. These meetings have often been criticized for the fact that the teacher is removed and the RFSU official is holding his or her own class with the students. To complete the Orwellian aspect of all of this, this representative is usually called “informer.”
An Informer that visited a class of 15 year olds in Umeå spent her time educating the pupils in “the right to be a whore at school” as well as playing the condom game. Apparently this game is similar to musical chairs, but the participants are divided into groups represented by various kinds of condoms. The game was mandatory for all pupils.
All French ticklers please rise?
Anna Kosztovics, who in 2005 was active in the Malmö district for RFSU, wrote about the importance of allowing children to “play sex”. She based her article on her own experiences when she held educational courses for kindergarten kids during 2003. The focus seemed to have been on “breaking the hetero-nom” and to allow public masturbation in the quiet areas of the kindergarten. Public masturbation is a reoccurring theme in RFSU education, and usually labelled knullkoja (fuck-hut).
anna
Anna Kosztovics being wonderful and jittery.
Anna Kosztovics goes on to describe a ”normal” occurrence where two seven year old boys competed in a hockey game and the loser had to suck the other boys penis after each lost game. The boy that usually won said he mostly won because didn’t like the smell of urine from the other boy’s member. She ends her article by explaining how she considers the subject “wonderful and jittery”.
Apart from sending Informers to schools and kindergartens, RFSU are working in close harmony with the Church of Sweden. At confirmation camps, 14-year-olds were educated and then issued a “knullborgarmärke.” This is a play with words, referring to a “simborgarmärke” that indicates that you can swim 200 meters.
Knullborgarmärke should be roughly translated into “fuck-badge.” According to RFSU, the badge gave the 14-year-olds a license to have sex. Since the informers are alone with the kids, priests responsible for the camps claimed they did not know of this occurrence. The practice was stopped once it leaked in 2007.
Current projects include a norm breaking work at the kindergarten of Västerås, where the game “mom, dad, kids” is to be replaced with the “family game” instead, since it could be daddy, daddy, daddy, kid or whatever other combination of sexes. The youngest groups at this school are apparently 1 – 5 years old.
150520080636808_1
Thank God they don’t play a hockey game!
The information campaign of 2015 includes classes where participants are to moan, touch themselves and say phrases like “harder” and “softer.” Four couples are presented in the informational movies, two heterosexual and two homosexual. The target group for the campaign is Swedish 13-year-old schoolchildren.
Actual tax money on top of these various businesses is hard to estimate. I have tried to get a vague idea, but it is almost impossible, since, like so many other tax posts in Sweden, the figures given are shady at best.

Gay And “Whatever Letter Combination Is In Fashion” Rights

RFSL, Swedish Federation for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgender Rights, is a younger organization, although it boasts to be the oldest gay rights organization in the world. It was founded in 1950 by Allan Hellman.
Apart from working towards legalizing gay marriage, gay adoption, and to generally make homosexuality more accepted in society, RFSL has also been active in trying to lower the age of consent (currently 15). This work was carried out by a group called Pedophile Working Group.
Today, RFSL officially rejects the idea of consensual sex between adults and children. They were also opposing laws making AIDS carriers legally bound to inform their sex partners of their disease.
Its current leader is Ulrika Westerlund, who has a passed at the feminist magazine Bang. For all you that read my previous article on the Silence Norm of libraries, you might remember this publication.
RFSL_sz052591
Ulrika Westerlund looking for government funding
Just as RFSU, tax spending on RFSL is very hard to estimate. It is usually on a rather local level and based on personal connections. In Malmö, the representative for the communist party, Hanna Thomé, increased funding yearly from 340,000 SEK 2009 to 1.9 million 2014. The entire sum for all of Sweden can only be guessed.
hanna
Hanna Thomé, eager to hand out other peoples money
A truly lucrative business is the selling of HBTQ certificates. Swedish municipalities, libraries, churches etc. need to pay RFSU for the schooling to be able to pass the test to get this. However, these certificates expire after three years, and then need to be bought again.
There are currently 290 municipalities in Sweden, and a certificate cost around 6 million SEK (700,000 USD) for a normal one. Apart from educating the workforce, informers are chosen by the best students that are expected to report any occurrences of homophobic behaviors or expressions.
Bad conversations are to be stopped and theories such as postmodern feminist theory, queer theory, gender, post-colonial theory, black feminism and racialization should be encouraged. This is the official list of issued certificates so far.
Radical Socialists In Our Midst
RFSL is more openly socialist and communist than RFSU. Dispatch International interviewed representatives for the organization as was openly told that “what is good for the collective is good for the individual.”
Many more radical groups seem to be loosely associated to RFSL. Perhaps “Hetero hate day” is one of the more flamboyant. According to the participant in this video, the day is about the struggle against the hetero society. He goes on to name the emotions they celebrate, that apart from hate include “a little bit of horniness, a little bit of frustration, a little bit of joy. Perhaps a little bit of love and such as well.” The event is sponsored by the Institute for Queer studies and as such receives tax funded sponsoring.
RFSL is currently engaged in a rather peculiar conflict, as a pride is being planned in the Muslim dominated suburbs of Stockholm. This pride is organized by men and women linked to the nationalistic party Sverigedemokraterna and for that reason, the homosexuals taking part in this march are being labelled racists by RFSL and many other prominent members of Swedish MSM.
The march will, unless RFSL manage to stop it, be held on the 29th of July. A gay counter event will be held at the same time by “anti-racist” HBTQ activists. A rather funny internal argument arose around this counter event, which at first was labeled as a picnic, but as the word “picnic” was suspected of having racist origins the activity was changed to “hang-put”.
We will try to cover this event in future articles. Until then, please enjoy your “male privilege” while it lasts.
Read More: Swedish Government Spends Billions On Gender Equality With Little Effect
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Tuesday, August 18, 2015

We Need White Wounding

To Work Toward Racial Justice We Need White Wounding

Posted: Updated:
Print
Melissa Renwick via Getty Images
(This is addressed to white people, from white people. The use of "you", "us", "we", "our", etc. are used accordingly. It is also written in the context of how race operates in the United States, though the impacts of whiteness are global).
2015-08-14-1439517166-6710611-2015080295140627.jpg
Artwork: "Save us From Ourselves" - Kelly Pickering, 2008
Whiteness was designed to exclude, and to simultaneously offer those of us classified as white certain comforts, privileges, as well as political, economic, and cultural supremacy. Because of this, whiteness harms those it excludes and classifies as others. Importantly, it does so on our behalf.
Owning up to and acknowledging the inherited benefits of whiteness, and encouraging other white people to do so as well, is an integral aspect of working toward racial justice in white spaces.
Yet, when confronted with the depth of sins whiteness has and continues to commit to the benefit of all white people, many of us--even those who claim they share in the desire to work toward racial justice--are scared away.
And so, often, white people working toward racial justice do so with an eye toward creating a new version of whiteness, rather than dealing with whiteness as it exists. Now let's be clear, working toward a healthier version of whiteness is an important normative ideal. But not when it comes at the expense of dealing with the unjust, and immoral system of white supremacy as it exists, in favor of focusing on idealistic versions of whiteness designed to make us individually feel better. Put differently, we need philosophers, scholars, engaged citizens, and thoughtful actors imagining the world as it could be--but when the subject at hand is literally a matter of survival for black people and/or People of Color, it's our belief that the focus of white anti-racists should tilt heavily toward honestly dealing with the injustices in front of us.
As such, tearing down the system of white supremacy much of the world operates on is a prerequisite to forming any meaningful healthy version of whiteness. This is work that will not be accomplished in our lifetime. It simply isn't possible. This must be intergenerational work, not intragenerational work.
The primary question for white anti-racists then, should ask how we can accelerate the break up of white supremacy, rather than what type of whiteness should come next--or if we can rid ourselves of whiteness altogether.
Importantly, the effort to break up white supremacy posthaste requires a diversity of tactics, efforts, people, organizations, opinions, and so on. What's suggested here is hardly meant to encompass that range, and it is not meant to demean or necessarily render an opinion on most of the tactics other white people are using in this fight. It is to critique a misguided focus on creating a version of whiteness that seems more akin to escapism than a realistic possibility, and one that we believe diverts us from the real work at hand.
More than anything it's a thought. A notion. One that's being worked out on these pages as it's typed. As such, it will be missing key pieces. It will likely be wrongheaded in certain (hopefully not all) aspects.
At its core, our proposal is simple. White people need to open ourselves up to a particular type of wounding to genuinely understand and then work toward racial justice. Our comfort and privilege generally keeps us from incurring these wounds naturally, and thus they must be sought out, disseminated, and used to motivate action.
In its historic and current function, whiteness wounds others on our behalf. Understanding this is critical to anti-racist work in white spaces. But learning about and acknowledging this reality often disrupts white comfort, conjures senses of guilt, or shame, and thus, white people often then selfishly turn to address and alleviate these sources of personal discomfort.
How can whiteness be better? we ask. How can we create a healthier feeling whiteness, one that doesn't produce or perpetuate harm? One that is welcoming and encourages other "good" white people to join in the struggle for racial, social, and economic justice that we've committed ourselves to. A whiteness that can offer an alternative to the painful reality of what whiteness really is--oppression, exclusion, undue harm, undue benefit, privilege, and supremacy.
While good-natured, what these questions aren't asking is how we can tear down white supremacy and problematic whiteness. They're really asking, how can I feel better about my whiteness. As a result, they effectively help white people evade culpability in the system of white supremacy we remain draped within, rather than challenge it.
This doesn't deconstruct white supremacy. If anything it exemplifies it by centering and prioritizing white feelings.
Beyond this, if the goal is dismantling a system of white supremacy, changing our personal sense of whiteness misses the mark. Systems of power can and will exist regardless of the individual or even group mentalities or feelings of those operating within them. By educating ourselves on the damage caused by whiteness, and the system of white supremacy that undergirds it, and then turning to find a version of whiteness at-odds with this system, we don't tear the system down. Instead, perhaps counter-intuitively, we create actors within that system who no longer believe they are perpetuating it, which does exactly that.
Rather than turning our focus to finding ways to "heal" ourselves and build a more positive self-image, white people need to sit with our "wounds," which in reality simply means acknowledging and empathizing with as much of the pain that is inflicted on our behalf as possible. A good friend, artist and educator Charlena Wynn, recently reminded us of the old adage: white people talk about racism, black people and/or People of Color live it. So the least white people can do is to sit with as much awareness as we can muster, to talk about it, and try to truly revel in the heaviness of that pain without looking to excuse ourselves from its burden.
2015-08-14-1439518190-3405742-DSC03917.jpg
Surely, at this point, some readers might be wondering what good this tactic would do. Won't it just scare off "good" white people? Won't white people refuse to engage in this work if it's painful?
Maybe. Shit, probably.
But working toward racial justice cannot be about white people feeling better about our whiteness. If anything it should be about the opposite. And no, this doesn't mean you shouldn't be proud of who you are, or your heritage/ethnicity--but these are not the same as your whiteness.
People marked as non-white walk around with visible and invisible scars, deal with the opening of new and the reopening of old wounds, and face constant reminders of the harm done at their expense on behalf of whiteness. The job of white people working toward racial justice needs to involve opening ours and the eyes of other white people to these injuries, insisting we share or understand the pain as much as we can, and subsequently using this awareness to motivate and inform our fight against the system of white supremacy that perpetuates said harm.
Quickly, let's digress to note this fundamental way white wounding differs from white guilt. Guilt stems from awareness combined with inaction. White wounding is a call to action. White people who bemoan learning about or discussing racial inequality, and suggest it's an effort to make them feel guilty, are really only admitting their unwillingness to do anything to change the unjust status quo. If you ask us, they should feel guilty.
Today, it's the people who absolve any guilt by opting for racial euphemisms rather than slurs, who pretend they can't see color--erasing the differing realities of our experiences and histories that either come with or are applied to us based on color--and the moderates, who seem more detrimental than the overt racists using racial slurs, wearing hoods, and burning crosses.
It is the silence of the moderate, or the would-be anti-racist, that helps allow the victories of the overt racists to continue to oppress through mechanisms and stereotypes that we pretend are of the past, but have only become less overt, more difficult to quantify, and consequently harder to correct.
An injury is harder to ignore, though. And pain can be quite motivating. Hence, the need for white wounding.
It's time for white people to share in the hurt. To sit with the reality of what's been done in our name and to our benefit. And to allow this to inspire our work toward dismantling this system of racial hierarchy, oppression, and supremacy, that's existed and benefitted us for centuries.
This is a system that isn't broken, but is immoral. A system that isn't broken, but is unjust. A system that isn't broken, and thus, must be torn down before anyone should truly feel comfortable and healthy within it.
And in this sense, the only way to fix this unbroken system is to break it. To do that, those of us it protects and benefits must no longer sit immune from the pain caused by it. Comfort breeds inaction. When we are all uncomfortable, we can all work toward rebuilding. Toward healing. Until then, white anti-racists should sit with, and share our discomfort over the wounds exacted on our behalf with other white people, helping them to better understand and share these wounds of whiteness. And we must speak to other white people around us about this bluntly, forcefully, and without regard for white comfort or fragility.
Briefly, let's consider what this means, and what it doesn't. Or, vice versa.
First of all, it doesn't mean we're suggesting anti-racist whites should be angry or impatient with other white people we engage in discussions regarding race. Our anger isn't just unconstructive, it's comparatively unjustified in this discussion, and centering it embodies problematic whiteness.
When we say white people should be wounded, we're not suggesting white anti-racists should go around, angrily trying to make other white people feel bad for being white. Indeed, making someone feel bad about being white is different from helping them understand the wounds wrought by whiteness, and encouraging them to sit with those wounds without console or relief.
What it does mean is taking the time to engage, doing so patiently, and bluntly, without letting problematic white behavior slide (including our own), beating around the bush, or trying to make white people feel better about our whiteness when conversations get difficult or uncomfortable.
It also means we should make sure white people, including ourselves, are aware of the harm whiteness has and continues to inflict on our behalf. Rather than focusing on healing whiteness, we suggest white anti-racists should focus on sharing the wounds it's caused with other white people who would normally remain oblivious to them. In order to begin any process of healing these wounds, we must first be familiar with them. In a true testament to our position of privilege, this requires a deliberate process of personally seeking out and empathizing with these wounds. For this to be productive we must use that awareness to motivate our racial justice work.
White wounding means dedicating yourself to bearing witness to and learning about racial inequality and oppression, opening the door to understanding these issues in ways white comfort and privilege generally shield from our view. Understanding the context, history, and some of the calls to action being made to address these issues is a vital component of white wounding.
A basic example of this might be learning the stories of Rekia Boyd, Aiyana Stanley-Jones, Jessie Hernandez, Tanisha Anderson, Yvette Smith, Sandra Bland, and the countless other Black people/People of Color who fall victim to our brutal, racist police state, and then sharing their stories with white family and friends who might otherwise never know their names.
Going a little further might mean taking the time to learn the histories and contexts behind slavery, voting rights, redlining, the school-to-prison pipeline, disparities in unemployment rates, prison sentencing, the racial empathy gap and other manifestations of racial oppression, and then talking to and educating white friends and family on these subjects. What you learned in public school or during most college educations won't suffice.
Understanding the ways race impacts our lives is something white people need to be seek out and talk about for some of us to even become aware of. This is white privilege. White wounding seeks to disrupt this privilege by forcing these topics into our lives. This isn't a task that should be left to Black people and/or People of Color, it should be on us.
Sadly, the basic need for awareness among many white people regarding the realities of how race impacts lived experience remains a necessary step for the white community to take writ large.
Thus, white wounding is a call to action. It's time to put our friends, family, co-workers, bosses, partners, social media connections, and our own comfort aside. The problem is real, and it is killing people. At this moment one of the most important and rudimentary things white anti-racists can do is spread awareness among other whites about racial inequality and oppression. It's time for white wounding.
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Stolen lighthouse

#1) "The media is the problem", NO, it's the vast majority of the "African Americans", who inflict upon the rest of America their racical tribalism, as seen in siding with the thug, JUST because he's black: (Officer Wilson "executed" Mike Brown in Ferguson, for example, in spite of the evidence, then there was the blanket denial of George Zimmerman's self-defense claim, in spite of all the witness testimony & forensic evidence supporting it).

#2) We live in an open-info society, so, there's no excuse why they would act like they didn't see the strong case supporting the contrary side voicing inconvenient facts. "African Americans" believe whatever they want to believe, it has nothing to do with facts. Media isn't the root of the problem... of course, there are some white "friends" who join the "African American" protests to feel important, to feed their narcissism, and for that, they will help the "African Americans" unjustly ruin the life of a white person.
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

I can look forward to this: As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness: United States — Muslim 1.0% Australia — Muslim 1.5% Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%
At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:
Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%
From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. ( United States ).
France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%
At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.
When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).
Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%
After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:
Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%
At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:
Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%
From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:
Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%
After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:
Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Friday, August 14, 2015

http://nypost.com/2015/08/13/man-tried-to-rape-woman-on-subway-in-park-slope-police-say/

“When I looked back, I saw he was on top of her,” Osborne said.
“She said he was about to rape her — that’s when I beat him up. All he said was, ‘I didn’t do anything.’”
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Sunday, August 09, 2015

jews hang 20 year old brits with piano wire

Commemorating British Casualties of Jewish Terrorism, 1944–1948

Francis Carr Begbie
Occidental Observer
August 8, 2015
031-e1438802048391
Normally, a gathering of British nationalists in central London, proudly bearing English banners and Union Flags, would be met with a horde of screaming demonstrators bussed in from far and wide. But no disturbance took place last weekend when such a group of patriots assembled near Trafalgar Square and the reason is not hard to discern.
For such interference would have meant drawing attention to a historic episode the British government and the Jewish community leaders would most likely wish forgotten — the killing of 784 British police officers, servicemen, Crown servants and civilian staff by Jewish terrorists in the Palestine Mandate crisis between 1944–48.
So that is why, although every broadcast and print outlet and every political party was circulated with a press release, there was a total media blackout.  It was a far cry from the anti-Shomrim demonstration against the establishment of a sectarian Jewish police force a month ago.
All par for the course. The British government’s attempt to “forget” the sacrifice of these servicemen and dump them down the memory hole is very reminiscent of another similarly embarrassing episode, the murderous Israeli attack on the USS Liberty in 1967.v
The British servicemen and police were a peacekeeping force serving in what was known as the British Palestine Mandate enclave just after the war. This Mandate was agreed as part of the Balfour Declaration and it was due to elapse in May, 1948.
It was a time of great tension. The Arabs were beginning to realize that the promises and assurances they had been given at Balfour counted for nothing and their homeland was being given away. The Jewish settlers were being reinforced by the illegal immigration of thousands of Jews from war-devastated Europe and reinforced by armaments from the Soviet Union and financial support from the USA.
Holding the line between them were young British servicemen and police, many of whom had come straight from the war in Europe and had taken part in the liberation of such camps as Bergen-Belsen, only to find themselves shot at and blown up by Jewish terrorists. Their deaths left a lasting bitterness among the veterans and their families.
The deaths included the hanging by piano wire of two 20-year-old British Army sergeants, Mervyn Paice and Clifford Martin, who in 1947 were kidnapped by Irgun and held hostage for three weeks. Their bodies were left hanging in a eucalyptus grove and were booby trapped with land mines.
Mervyn Paice and Clifford Martin, victims of the Irgun
Mervyn Paice and Clifford Martin, victims of the Irgun
Also the 100 British Army personnel, Crown servants and civilians who were murdered by means of a huge bomb planted by the Irgun in the basement of the King David Hotel, Jerusalem in July 1946.  Another 28 British soldiers died in the bombing of the Haifa Cairo train.
It is not widely known that the terrorism spread to Britain. Last weekend’s  wreath-laying ceremony near Trafalgar Square took place at the site of the British Colonies Club, which was bombed by members of the Irgun terrorist group on 7th March 1947 when numerous people were injured and maimed.
In Britain, another victim was Rex Farran, brother of the intended target, Captain Roy Farran DSO, MC — an SAS anti-terrorism specialist. Rex opened a parcel bomb addressed to “R. Farran” at the Farran family home in Staffordshire. A total of 20 letter bombs were sent in mainland  Britain.
Many attacks took place while the war was still going.  These include the murder of Lord Moyne, Secretary of State for the Colonies, and his British Army driver, Corporal Fuller, on 6th November 1944 while British forces were still fighting in France. The hand-gun assassinations were carried out in Cairo by the Stern Gang.
It was the same terrorists, from the Irgun and Stern Gang, who collaborated on a  massacre of at least 100 Arab civilian villagers at the village of Deir Yassin, on 10th April 1948.
As with the murder of the two young sergeants, the Deir Yassin operation was organised by Menachem Begin, later a prime minister of Israel. He also received a Nobel Peace Prize.
On May 19, 1947 the British government protested to the United States against American fund-raising drives for Palestine terrorist groups. The complaint referred to a “Letter to the Terrorists of Palestine” by playwright and screenwriter Ben Hecht, American League for a Free Palestine co-chairman, first published in the New York Post on May 15. The ad said, “We are out to raise millions for you.” This letter included the infamous phrase that every time British soldiers were shot or blown up “the Jews of America make a little holiday in their hearts.” During that period Hecht wrote under a pseudonym to avoid the British boycott of his work in effect until the early 1950s.
Hecht also wrote a Broadway play to raise money. In  A Flag is Born, the role of a Holocaust survivor was played by Marlon Brando. The London Evening Standard called it “the most virulent anti-British play ever staged in the United States.” However, Jewish syndicated columnist Walter Winchell, whose column appeared in over 2000 newspapers worldwide, said it was “worth seeing, worth hearing, and worth remembering. … It will wring your heart and eyes dry. … Bring at least 11 handkerchiefs.”
The deaths of British servicemen and the murderous ingratitude of the Jewish community caused a huge shock in post-war Britain. It is not widely known that the two young sergeants affair led to the last widespread anti-Jewish riots in Britain. Shop windows were smashed across Britain but especially in Glasgow, Liverpool and Manchester.
Despite the anger among the British, up until 2001 there was no memorial and it was only after 60 years that the Ministry of Defence agreed that the conflict merited its own campaign medal.
The Forgotten British Heroes meeting at Trafalgar Square heard a demand from Peter Rushton of Heritage & Destiny Magazine that one of the men responsible for the London bombing be brought to justice.
Today Robert Misrahi is one of those peculiarly French creations — the popular TV philosopher. The Sorbonne-trained academic enjoys a
reputation as a media figure and a professor of ethical philosophy.  But back in 1947 he was part of the Irgun gang which planted the bomb in the Colonies Club. He has never even been questioned over his part in the bombing.
Another of the culprits responsible for the King David Hotel went onto to enjoy a long life in Britain and boasted freely about her exploits without fear of any legal impediment.
Miriam Abramoff lived openly in the London suburbs and was giving interviews about her infamous past as recently as 2012. She died last year at the age of 88. She frequently returned to Israel and always took tea at the King David Hotel “It is so beautiful there now” she said.
Veteran nationalist Martin Webster was one of the organisers of the Forgotten British Heroes campaign. He was scathing about how they are not even allowed to take their place among all the other units of the British armed services to lay their wreaths at The Cenotaph in Whitehall on Remembrance Sunday:
No explanation for this exceptional ban on brave men and women at the national ceremony of remembrance has ever been given by official sources — but all know the ban has been imposed at the behest of the Jewish community’s sundry lobby organisations and their billionaire backers who donated millions of pounds every year to the main political parties.
The Establishment and the Jews can’t wait until the remnant of these brave men who served in Palestine (and their Old Comrades Associations) have died-off and no longer represent an ‘embarrassment’!
After the commemoration, the Israeli Ambassador in London, Daniel Taub, received a letter from the Campaign recollecting the details of the above Zionist atrocities. It makes several rather pointed demands given the highly successful history of Jewish post-WWII activism: that Israel pay compensation to the victims of Zionist terrorism and their families, build a ‘Museum of Zionist Terrorism’ in Jerusalem and institute courses about Zionist terrorism in Israel’s schools as a warning to future generations.
The letter is signed by Martin Webster, Richard Edmonds, Jeremy Turner, Lady Michèle Renouf, and Peter Rushton.
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

I never promised you a rose garden

if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Guide for the Mexican Invasion or don't do it illegally but if you must here are some tips


Distributed by the Mexican Ministry of Foreign Relations
Cover
View the Spanish language original here (PDF).

INTRODUCTION

Esteemed Countryman:
The purpose of this guide is to provide you with practical advice that may prove useful to you in case you have made the difficult decision to search for employment opportunities outside of your country.
The sure way to enter another country is by getting your passport from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, and the visa, which you may apply for at the embassy or consulate of the country you wish to travel to.

Reading this guide will make you aware of some basic questions about the legal consequences of your stay in the United States of America without the appropriate migratory documents, as well as about the rights you have in that country, once you are there, independent of your migratory status.However, in practice we see many Mexicans who try to cross the Northern Border without the necessary documents, through high risk zones that involve grave dangers, particularly in desert areas or rivers with strong, and not always obvious, currents.
Keep in mind always that there exist legal mechanisms to enter the United States of America legally.
In any case, if you encounter problems or run into difficulties, remember that Mexico has 45 consulates in that country whose locations you can find listed in this publication.

Familiarize yourself with the closest consulate and make use of it.

DANGERS IN CROSSING HIGH RISK ZONES

To cross the river can be very risky, above all if you cross alone and at night.
Heavy clothing increases in weight when wet and this makes swimming and floating difficult.

If you cross by desert, try to walk at times when the heat will not be too intense.
Highways and population centers are far apart, which means you will spend several days looking for roads, and you will not be able to carry foodstuffs or water for long periods of time. Also, you can get lost.

Salt water helps keep liquids in your body. Although you may feel more thirst if you drink salt water, the risk of dehydration is much less.
The symptoms of dehydration are:
— Little or no sweat.
— Dryness in the eyes and in the mouth.
— Headache.
— Tiredness and excessive exhaustion.
— Difficulty in walking and thinking.
— Hallucinations and visions.
If you get lost, guide yourself by lightposts, train tracks, or dirt roads.

BEWARE OF HUMAN TRAFFICKERS (COYOTES, POLLEROS)

They can deceive you with assurances of crossing in a few hours through the mountains and deserts. This is simply not so!
They can risk your life taking you across rivers, drainage canals, desert areas, train tracks, or highways. This has caused the deaths of hundreds of persons.

If you decide to hire people traffickers to cross the border, consider the following precautions:
Do not let them out of your sight. Remember that they are the only ones who know the lay of the land, and therefore the only ones who can get you out of that place.

Do not trust those who offer to take you to “the other side” and ask you to drive a car or to take or carry a package for them. Normally, those packages contain drugs or other prohibited substances. For this reason, many people have ended up in jail.

If you transport other persons, you can be confused with a human trafficker, and they can accuse you of the crime of trafficking or auto theft.
Do not entrust your minor children to strangers who offer to take them across to the United States.

DO NOT USE FALSE DOCUMENTS

DO NOT USE FALSE DOCUMENTS OR THOSE THAT DO NOT BELONG TO YOU, NOR DECLARE A FALSE NATIONALITY.
If you try to cross with false documents or those of another person, take into account the following:
To use false documents or those of another person is a federal crime in the United States, for which you can be tried in a criminal proceeding and end up in jail; likewise if you use a false name or say that you are a citizen of the United States when you are not one.
Do not lie to officials of the United States at ports and points of entry.

IF YOU ARE ARRESTED


Do not resist arrest.
Do not assault or insult officials.
Do not throw rocks or objects at officials or at patrols since this is considered a provocation by those officials.

If they believe themselves to be under attack, it is likely that they will use force to arrest you.
Raise your hands slowly so that they see you are not armed.
Do not have in your hands any object that could be considered a weapon such as spotlights, screwdrivers, pocket knives, knives, or rocks.
Do not run or try to escape.
Do not hide in dangerous places.
Do not cross high-speed highways.
It is better to be arrested for a few hours and repatriated to Mexico than to get lost in the desert.

IF THEY ARREST YOU, YOU HAVE RIGHTS!

Give your real name.
If you are a minor accompanied by an adult, tell the authorities so they do not separate you.

Your rights are:
To know where you are.
To ask that they allow you to contact a representative of the closest Mexican consulate for assistance.

Not to make statements or to sign documents, above all if they are in English, without the advise of a defense lawyer or Mexican consular representative.
To receive medical attention if you are injured or in delicate health.
To be respected in your person and to receive dignified treatment without regard to your migratory status.
To have safe transport.
To have food and water whenever you need it.
You are not obligated to state your migratory status at the time of arrest.
You have the right not to be beaten or insulted.

Not to be held incommunicado.
In case they take away your things, ask for a receipt so that you can claim them upon release.
It is important that you inform your lawyer or Mexican consular representative who visits you of any infringement of these rights. Also inform the closest office of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs in Mexico.
If you want more information and you live in Texas or the city of Acuña, Coahuila, tune in to “La Poderosa” (The Powerful) at 1570 AM.

IN CASE OF ARREST

If you are sentenced for a crime or you are jailed and facing a criminal proceeding, you have the following rights:
Not to be discriminated against by the police, the courts, or prison officials.
To receive visits by Mexican consular personnel and members of your family.
To receive legal representation without conditions and obstacles.
"Laws"
If you are facing a criminal proceeding and you have not yet been sentenced, ask your lawyer or consular representative about pleading guilty.
Do not declare yourself guilty without first consulting your lawyer about the chances of winning your case.
It is important that you know the laws of the state where you live and work since the laws in each one are different. Consider the following advice:
If you drink, do not drive, since if you do not have documents, you can be arrested and deported.
If a legal resident is convicted more than twice for drinking under the influence, he can be deported.
Do not drive without a drivers license.
Respect traffic laws and use your seatbelt.
Do not drive without insurance and do not agree to drive a stranger’s car.
Do not let strangers into your car.
If when driving, you commit a traffic infraction and you are stopped by the police, place your hands on the steering wheel and do not get out of the car until the officer requests that you do so.

Avoid calling attention to yourself while you normalize your stay or process your documents to live in the United States.

The best way is not to change your routine of going from your job to your home.
Avoid noisy parties. The neighbors can get annoyed and call the police, and you can be arrested.
Avoid getting involved in fights.
If you go to a bar or night club, and a fight starts, leave, since in the confusion you could be arrested even though you have done anything.
Avoid family or domestic violence. As in Mexico, it is a crime in the United States.

Domestic violence is not only physical, but it also includes threats, screaming, and ill-treatment.
If you are accused of domestic violence against your children, spouse, or some other person who lives with you, you could go to jail. In addition, the Child Protective Service could take away your children.
Do not carry firearms, knives, or other dangerous objects.
Keep in mind that many Mexicans are dead or in prison for that.
If the police enter your house or apartment, do not resist. However, ask for a proper warrant. It is better to cooperate and to seek to communicate with the closest Mexican consulate.
"Search Warrant."

CONSULATES

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has 45 consular offices in the Interior and on the Southern Border of the United States of America whose function is to help you. Remember, if you have been arrested or are serving a prison term, you have the right to communicate with the closest Mexican Consulate.

Stay close to the Consulate.Always carry your Consular Protection Guide.
Stay close to Mexico.
It is your home, Countryman!
MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS General Directorate of Protection and Consular Affairs




if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Saturday, August 08, 2015

Apple Jacks, rest stop

Giant fookun redwood town and free.  Nice old bar.
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Giant redwoods ...no really giant

if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Near redwood city California

if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Tuesday, August 04, 2015

Paul Singer and the Universality of “Anti-Semitism”

 

Andrew Joyce
Occidental Observer
August 4, 2015

Paul Singer: Post-Modern Shylock
Paul Singer: Post-Modern Shylock
One of the most fundamental positions for White advocates concerned with Jewish influence must be the conviction that antagonism against Jews lies in Jewish behavior rather than solely the cultural pathology or psychological tendencies of non-Jews. A major testing ground for this position is the necessity for anti-Jewish attitudes to be present among geographically, racially, and culturally diverse peoples, and for the reasons behind this antagonism to be fairly uniform. In Separation and Its Discontents Kevin MacDonald argued that a social identity theory of anti-Semitism is highly compatible with supposing that anti-Semitism will be a very common characteristic of human societies in general. Reasons for this pervasiveness lie in Jewish cultural separatism leading to the perception of the Jewish group as an alien entity; inter-group resource and reproductive competition; and finally, the fact that Jews are, for cultural and genetic reasons, highly adept in resource competition against non-Jews. Additionally, Jews are adept at influencing culture and creating and influencing intellectual and political movements which often run contrary to the interests of the host population. Wherever these behaviors and circumstances are present, they contribute to the arousal of hostility in a host population.
Despite overwhelming evidence in support of our position, the vast majority of Jewish historiography and apologetics continue to argue something quite different. Our opponents have successfully disseminated the view that anti-Semitism is a peculiarly Western phenomenon, rooted more or less in a cocktail of evil Christian theology, the implicit frustrations of capitalist society, the despotic nature of the Western family, and even repressed sexual desires. A key aspect of maintaining this narrative has been to downplay non-Western (mainly Muslim) anti-Semitism, or attempt to give it different features. However, as MacDonald has noted, “the remarkable thing about anti-Semitism is that there is an overwhelming similarity in the complaints made about Jews in different places and over very long periods of historical time.”[1] Of the universal themes noted by MacDonald, the theme of resource competition and economic domination is perhaps foremost.
I was moved to reflect on the universality of this theme recently when surveying media coverage on Korean and Argentinian responses to the activities of Paul Singer and his co-ethnic shareholders at Elliot Associates, an arm of Singer’s Elliot Management hedge fund. The Korean story has its origins in the efforts of Samsung’s holding company, Cheil Industries, to buy SamSung C&T, the engineering and construction arm of the wider Samsung family of businesses. The move can be seen as part of an effort to reinforce control of the conglomerate by the founding Lee family and its heir apparent, Lee Jae-Jong. Trouble emerged when Singer’s company, which  holds a 7.12% stake in SamSung C&T and is itself attempting to expand its influence and control of Far East tech companies, objected to the move. The story is fairly typical of Jewish difficulties in penetrating business cultures in the Far East where impenetrable family monopolies, known in Korea as chaebols, are common. This new story reminded me very strongly of last year’s efforts by Jewish financier Daniel Loeb to obtain a board seat at Sony. Loeb was repeatedly rebuffed by COO Kuzuo Hirai, eventually selling his stake in Sony Corp. in frustration.
The predominantly Jewish-owned and operated Elliot Associates has a wealth of self-interest in preventing the Lee family from consolidating its control over the Samsung conglomerate. As racial outsiders, however, Singer’s firm were forced into several tactical measures in their 52-day attempt to thwart the merger. First came lawsuits.  When those failed, Singer and his associates then postured themselves as defending Korean interests, starting a Korean language website and arguing that their position was really just in aid of helping domestic Korean shareholders. This variation on the familiar theme of Jewish crypsis was quite unsuccessful. The Lee family went on the offensive immediately and, unlike many Westerners, were not shy in drawing attention to the Jewish nature of Singer’s interference and the sordid and intensely parasitic nature of his fund’s other ventures.

“Because of Elliot Associates, Congo suffered even more hardship.”
“Because of Elliot Associates, Congo suffered even more hardship.”
The Lee offensive started with a series of cartoons posted on the Samsung website. Most singled out the manner in which Elliot Associates has enjoyed its remarkable growth by focussing on the purchase of national debts from struggling countries at a fraction of their worth, before using ruthless legal measures to sue those countries for values far exceeding the original debt. On its most basic level, the practice is really just the same as Jewish involvement in medieval tax farming. On the older practice, Salo Baron writes in Economic History of the Jews that Jewish speculators would pay a lump sum to the treasury before mercilessly turning on the peasantry to obtain “considerable surpluses … if need be, by ruthless methods.”[2] The activities of Elliot Associates are really the same speculation in debt, except here the trade in usury is practiced on a global scale with the feudal peasants of old now replaced with whole nations. The above cartoon refers to the specific activities of Elliot Associates in Congo where it originally bought $32.6 million in sovereign debt incurred by that country for the knockdown price of under $20 million. In 2002 and 2003, a British court (tactically chosen) forced the Congolese government to settle for an estimated $90 million, which included that all-important interest and fees. Elliot Associates rapidly became known as the quintessential “Vulture Fund.”
As I noted in my previous examination of contemporary Jewish usury, Jews have been at the forefront of innovation in debt for many centuries, and remain its most adroit auteurs. Although obviously rooted in centuries of Jewish financial practice, Singer and his co-ethnics (all four equity partners of Elliot are Jewish and its COO is the charmingly-named Zion Shohet), pioneered the finer points of the Vulture Fund concept. The firm was born in 1977 when Singer pooled $1.3 million from family and friends, but it only really took off in October 1995, when Elliott Associates L.P. purchased $28.7 million of Panamanian sovereign debt for the discounted price of $17.5 million. The banks holding those bonds, a group that included heavy hitters like Citi and Credit Suisse, had given up on repayment from Panama. To cut their losses they sold their holdings to Elliott which, like a medieval tax farmer, went in with a heavy hand. When Panama’s government asked for a restructuring of its foreign debt in 1995, the vast majority of its bondholders agreed — apart from Elliott. In July 1996, Elliott Associates, represented by one of the world’s most high-profile securities law firms, filed a lawsuit against Panama in a New York district court seeking full repayment of the original $28.7 million — plus interest and fees. The case made its way from a district court in Manhattan to the New York State Supreme Court, which sided with Elliott. In the end, Panama’s government had to pay the Jewish group over $57 million, with an additional $14 million going to other creditors. Overnight Singer’s group made $40 million, and the people of Panama found their original sovereign debt had more than doubled.
Foreign Policy described the court’s decision as “a groundbreaking moment in the modern history of finance.” By taking the case to a New York district court, Elliott broke with long-standing international law and custom, according to which sovereign governments are not sued in regular courts meant to deal with questions internal to a nation state. Further, the presiding judge accepted the case — another break with custom. It set the stage for two decades of similar parasitism on struggling countries by Elliot Associates, a practice that has reaped billions for Jewish financiers. Just one year after the Panama decision, Singer spent about $11 million on government-backed Peruvian bank debt in 1996. After taking Peru to court in the U.S., U.K., Luxembourg, Belgium, Germany, and Canada, the struggling nation finally agreed in 2000 to pay him $58 million. That meant he got better than a 400 percent return. In 2001 Elliot Associates purchased an Argentinian default for $48 million — the face value of that debt today is $630 million. The fund wants repayment for the full value of the debt to all of Argentina’s creditors, as it did in 1995 with Panama. This amounts to $1.5 billion, which could rise to $3 billion including, again, that all-important interests and fees.
The merciless nature of these Jewish vulture funds has provoked some comment, but the general populations of many countries aren’t familiar with enough of the facts to start joining the dots. Nevertheless, this type of financial parasitism has had a devastating impact on a number of nations. A sovereign’s money is technically owned by its citizens. Making the Panamanian, Argentinian, Congolese, Ecuadorian, Polish or Vietnamese government pay for the full value of the debt, plus interest and fees, even as the major creditors accepted a discounted payment, meant handing citizens’ money to a hedge fund rather than investing in, for example, roads, schools, hospitals, clean water projects or social welfare programs. In the aftermath of Elliot’s judgment against Congo, the Congolese were forced to abandon water purification programs leading to widespread dehydration. It was to this context that the Samsung cartoon referred.

“Elliott Management’s representative method of earning money is to buy the national debt of a struggling country cheaply, then insist on taking control as an investor and start a legal suit.”
“Elliott Management’s representative method of earning money is to buy the national debt of a struggling country cheaply, then insist on taking control as an investor and start a legal suit.”
Other cartoons appearing at the same time represented Elliot, literally, as humanoid vultures with captions referring to the well-known history of the fund. In the above cartoon, the vulture offers assistance to a needy and destitute figure, but conceals an axe with which to later bludgeon the unsuspecting pauper.
After the cartoons appeared Singer and other influential Jews, including Abraham Foxman, cried anti-Semitism. This was despite the fact the cartoons contain no reference whatsoever to Judaism — unless of course one defines savage economic predation as a Jewish trait. Samsung denied the cartoons were anti-Semitic and took them off the website, but the uproar over the cartoons only seemed to spur on even more discussion about Jewish influence in South Korea than was previously the case. In a piece published a fortnight ago, Media Pen columnist Kim Ji-ho claimed “Jewish money has long been known to be ruthless and merciless.” Last week the former South Korean ambassador to Morocco, Park Jae-seon, expressed his concern about the influence of Jews in finance when he said, “The scary thing about Jews is they are grabbing the currency markets and financial investment companies. Their network is tight-knit beyond one’s imagination.” The next day, cable news channel YTN aired similar comments by local journalist Park Seong-ho, who stated on air that “it is a fact that Jews use financial networks and have influence wherever they are born.” It goes without saying that comments like these are unambiguously similar to complaints about Jewish economic practices in Europe over the course of centuries. The only common denominator between the context of fourteenth-century France and the context of twenty first-century South Korea is, you guessed it, Jewish economic practices.
In the end, the Lee strategy, based on drawing attention to the alien and exploitative nature of Elliot Associates, was overwhelmingly effective. Before a crucial shareholder vote on the Lee’s planned merger, Samsung Securities CEO Yoon Yong-am, said: “We should score a victory by a big margin in the first battle in order take the upper hand in a looming war against Elliott, and keep other speculative hedge funds from taking short-term gains in the domestic market.” When the vote finally took place a few days ago, a conclusive 69.5% of Samsung shareholders voted in favor of the Lee proposal, leaving Elliot licking its wounds and complaining about the ‘patriotic marketing’ of those behind the merger.
Jewish difficulties in penetrating close-knit Far Eastern monopolies, many of which are open in their belief that Jews are capable and ruthless opponents in business, thus persist. East Asians are seemingly aware that giving Jewish businessmen an inch will normally lead to non-Jews losing a mile. It is this honest grappling with the facts that kept Daniel Loeb off the board at Sony, and prevented Elliot Associates from making even slight gains at Samsung.
The Far East also appears less prone to Jewish moralizing about the “dangers” of anti-Semitism, and one finds that criticism of Jewish behaviors enjoys a considerably higher level of intellectual and cultural respectability. A good example is when Foumiko Kometani won the 1986 Akutagawa award, Japan’s top literary prize, for her novel Passover. Based on her real-life experiences with her Jewish husband and severely retarded bi-racial son, Kometani’s novel was subjected to excoriating criticism from Jewish critics who denounced her unflattering (but presumably quite accurate) depictions of Jewish figures in the book as “anti-Semitic.” Japanese critics, on the other hand, were notably unaffected by negative Jewish press treatment of the book, and found the treatment of Jewish clannishness and “distasteful” religious practices to be enriching qualities which gave the work a greater sense of authenticity and honesty.
Switching our focus to South America, high-profile figures in Argentina have also been accused of pushing “anti-Semitic conspiracy theories” for their responses to Elliot’s parasitism. After Singer’s firm won an extortionate judgment against Argentina at the US Supreme Court last year, Argentina President, Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, described Singer on her personal website as the “Vulture Lord.” But Jewish power-brokers were left even more aghast at Kirchner’s open denunciation of a “global modus operandi” that “generates international political operations of any type, shape and color.” They “contribute to financial attacks or simultaneous international media operations, or even worse, covert actions of various ‘services’ designed to destabilize governments.”
What Kirchner was referring to was the underlying issue at the heart of Singer’s particularly venomous pursuit of Argentine debt. You see, Argentina has cultivated relations with Iran for a number of decades now, and rumor has it that Kirchner and her foreign minister conspired with Iran to cover up its involvement in the 1994 bombing of a Jewish community center in Buenos Aires. Two years ago Jewish prosecutor Alberto Nisman lobbied the Delegation of Argentine Israeli Associations (Daia) — which represents the country’s Jews — to mount a legal challenge against a memorandum of understanding between Argentina and Iran. Nisman is reported to have told the Delegation that “if necessary, Paul Singer will help us.” Nisman then turned his attention to pursuing Kirchner for the alleged cover-up over the bombing. Argentina thus came under Jewish financial, political, diplomatic and legal attack. In January this year, however, Nisman was found dead with a single bullet wound to the head just hours before he was due to take his final report to Congress. Israelis and diaspora Jews have been crying foul ever since. In retaliation, Kirchner has pointed out that Singer is indeed one of the major funders of The Israel Project (TIP), the most vocal lobby in Washington against diplomacy with Iran. Kirchner argues that Singer’s effort to financially ravage Argentina is merely an extension of denunciations of Argentine-Iranian relations by AIPAC and Mark Dubowitz’s Foundation for Defense of Democracies. Also, by his own admission, Dubowitz was a personal friend of Nisman. Or in Kirchner’s words, “Everything has to do with everything.”
Of course, openly stating that Jews are powerful and work together for financial and political goals breaks one of the most cherished of contemporary taboos. Despite the astonishing level and deeply entwined nature of Jewish wealth and political power on display, I’m guessing the kosher script would have us all believe that what we are observing is just a bunch of coincidences and that Jews are in fact as poor and powerless as the next guy. “It’s a lie,” said Daia’s vice-president Waldo Wolff. “It’s terrible, it’s incredible.” A spokesman for Elliott Management denied the accusations, saying the suggestion “that Mr Singer had any contact whatsoever with Mr Nisman is categorically false. This is just another desperate attempt by Cristina Kirchner to blame creditors for her administration’s multiplying scandals and failed economic policies.” Of course, with reference to the facts outlined above, both Jewish groups are simply lying. Their lies didn’t assist the investigation of the 1994 bombing, with a new prosecutor dismissing all claims against Kirchner in April. Also, Nisman’s murder remains unsolved.
As Singer continues to tighten the screws on Argentina, the nation and its President continue to provoke accusations of “anti-Semitism.” During a July 2 visit to a Buenos Aries school, Kirchner told students that to better understand Argentina’s economic crisis, they should read Shakespeare’s The Merchant of Venice. On Twitter Kirchner recounted how she had asked students she met which Shakespeare play they were studying. When they told the president they were studying Romeo and Juliet, Kirchner said she responded, “I said, ‘Have you read The Merchant of Venice to understand the vulture funds?’ They all laughed. “No, don’t laugh,” I said, “Usury and the bloodsuckers were immortalized by the best literature for centuries.” The Delegation of Argentine Jewish Associations, quickly issued a statement condemning Kirchner’s comments and accused her of having “anti-Semitic” motivations behind her invocation of the play. Abraham Foxman then waddled onto the stage, urging Kirchner to “stop reinforcing anti-Semitic stereotypes.” “We are deeply concerned that President Cristina Fernandez de Kirchner is once again promoting anti-Semitic stereotypes,” whined Foxman. “The Merchant of Venice — with its nefarious character Shylock — reinforces stereotypes of Jews and presents them as money-hungry, conniving and cruel, and by suggesting students to study this play, she is sending a message to Argentina’s youth that Jews are somehow connected to the economic woes of her country.”
God forbid Argentine youth should ever come to such a view! How unfair that would be when the firm behind its pauperization is so thoroughly staffed by such Anglo-Saxons as Paul Singer, Zion Shohet, Jesse Cohn, Stephen Taub, Elliot Greenberg and Richard Zabel.
A final note about the Vulture Fund Jews. As hinted above in relation to their pro-Israel, anti-Iran activities, they are not just financially predatory. As Kirchner has stated, “Everything is connected to everything.” At TOO we are aware of the fact that strongly identifying as Jewish normally involves a great deal of hostility toward the traditions of the European peoples. This has very often led to attempts by powerful Jewish financiers and intellectuals to open our borders to mass immigration and overturn traditional values. I was recently sent a piece from CNBC which highlighted the fact that the U.S. Supreme Court decision in favor of same-sex marriage was welcomed by “a perhaps surprising group: conservative hedge fund managers.”
The news might have surprised CNBC, but won’t surprise TOO readers, or indeed anyone remotely familiar with the nature of the Jewish conflict with the West. There is nothing at all genuinely “conservative” about these people. The hedge fund managers included Dan Loeb, who failed to get the board seat at Sony, Paul Singer, Steve Cohen of Point72 Asset Management and Cliff Asness of AQR Capital Management. All have been vocal in disapproving of President Barack Obama, mainly for his diplomacy with Iran, but all have worked for years in support of gay marriage. “It’s a gratifying day for equality under the law,” Asness said after the Supreme Court ruling. “We’re pleased with the Court’s ruling because we believe in social justice for all Americans and hope this serves as a catalyst for global change,” added Cohen. Singer created American Unity PAC in 2012 to support the cause, and plowed $11 million into making gay marriage a reality. Other donors to American Unity PAC included Loeb, Asness, Seth Klarman of Baupost Group, and David Tepper of Appaloosa Management.  According to CNBC, Loeb, Cohen, Singer and other Jewish debt speculators helped to successfully push the legalization of same-sex marriage in New York in 2011. And backers of non-profit Freedom to Marry included Loeb, Klarman, Singer and Asness. So in case you’re wondering where a lot of that plundered international cash went, I can tell you that it ended up in places like the Jewish Institute for National Security Affairs, and in myriad efforts to deconstruct the traditional fabric of your society (while still being called “conservative” by MSNBC).
“Anti-Semitism” isn’t a peculiarly Western phenomenon. Nor is it a Korean phenomenon, or an Argentine phenomenon. It is a Jewish phenomenon, and it has followed the Jewish people through the centuries and across the oceans. As long as Jews remain unchanged, so too will the response to them remain unchanged. Efforts to ameliorate “anti-Semitism” through vacuous appeals that it has its origins in sexual repression, Christianity, or family structure may succeed in a West which has grown fat, lazy, navel-gazing and maudlin, and is inundated by pro-Jewish propaganda in the media and educational system. But elsewhere on this Earth such Talmudic theorizing doesn’t go far. The inscrutable Asian will smile and nod at the Hebrew mogul, while patiently and knowingly keeping him from taking a seat or position in his financial affairs. Those in the Second or Third World, at the sharp end of Jewish usury, will remain unconvinced by the pious weeping of the perennial “victim” of world oppression who, paradoxically, possesses the whip hand over them. When the flagship of the Argentinian Navy was seized and detained in Ghana back in 2012 on the say-so of Paul Singer, there was no doubting the level of power that had now been attained by Jewish finance.
singer2Western youth today are engaged in squeezing itself into skinny jeans and protesting on behalf of African and Mexican invaders. While this pampered generation sips on artisanal coffee, and parades its empathy with alien criminals and a multitude of “trans” aberrations of nature, it remains ignorantly unaware that a cabal of vultures circles above them, just waiting for a fateful slip of their national economies. The U.S. government, it has been said, has made a point of siding with Argentina in its conflict with Elliot Management — the reason being that there are fears in Washington that it too may one day end up under the vulture’s talons.
The man on the street will deny the existence of such a threat, but we know it to be an empirically observable and documented fact. We can only hope for, and work towards, a time when our people will awaken, and allow us to secure a future for our children before it is too late.

[1] K. MacDonald, Separation and Its Discontents: Toward and Evolutionary Theory of Anti-Semitism, (First Paperpack Edition,2004), 38.
[2] S. Baron (ed) Economic History of the Jews (New York, 1976), 46-7.
if you don't comment no angel will gets its wings... 0

Constititution of the United States: 1st Amendment, Bill of Rights : "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

eXTReMe Tracker